Since being exposed as the author of her blogsites Esther Rockett has been busy trying to clean up her act. In the process she is crying out victimisation, intimidation and harassment for being exposed as a cyber-bully and internet troll. Even suggesting that the Universal Medicine Facts site has gone on a ‘personal offensive’ against them. An interesting response from a woman and her gang who has spent two years relentlessly blogging, attacking and pursuing Serge Benhayon, Universal Medicine and also personally going after anyone associated with them. In her cries of indignation she seems to have lost touch with the filth and vitriol she has penned against numerous individuals under the guise of Pranic Princess (Nobody’s bitch) and Darkly Venus, instead imagining herself as Esther Rockett, Health Care Activist.
In fact, Esther Rockett has become quite incensed by our publishing the truth about her and her friends with rants about why we could not talk to her like ‘reasonable’ people
Perhaps the answer to this question lies in the evident incapacity for reasonable conversation exhibited by Esther Rockett, Lance Martin and Robert Macindoe.
Esther Rockett’s responses to reasonable requests or approaches for reasonable discussion have led to monumental displays of intimidation and harassment, no less evident than in her response to a caring letter from a previous client who had not seen her for some time and a telephone conversation with her previous client’s daughter. The former client, having seen Esther Rockett’s online behaviour, made contact to attempt to discuss her concerns about Esther Rockett’s well-being and the material that was being presented on her blog sites that was so obviously untrue. How do I know of this? Because Esther published the communications in the most scathing and derogatory tones, bending the material to suit her maligned views. Is this how Esther Rockett deals with an ex-client (whom she likely still owes a continuing duty of care to) and those whom attempt reasonable communications?
And just to illustrate this point – this from one of Esther’s team:
‘FUCK OFF IF YOU THINK YOU CAN SUE US OR COMPLAIN TO AHPRA…
WILL REITERATE – FUCK YOU, FUCK YOUR FAMILY AND FUCK OFF AND YOU TOTALLY CAN’T SUE US YOU GULLIBLE TWAT.’
In her latest complaints about Universal Medicine Facts, Esther Rockett’s indignant cries become more hysterical, with claims that her team of cyber-bullies have never made threats.
We’ve written a lot of criticism and expressed anger and frustration at UM’s self-loving callousness, but we’ve never made threats. Never.
And never threatened violence
But anything goes for the Esoteric lynch mob – working themselves up to this crescendo of malice.’
We might start with Esther’s own response to someone who wished to be removed from the ubiquitous Naming Names page, a device that Esther Rockett uses as form of threat, in and of itself. Her approach is to threaten anyone who is associated with Universal Medicine to be named on the Naming Names page where she attacks their professional standing and makes false allegations against all those listed. We can leave it to the reader to decide if this is threatening or not. It may not be physically threatening, but appears to be a threat of a kind:
‘I wrote back with a message to go fuck herself. A qualified counsellor and psychotherapist who thinks it’s a waste of time to expose a narcissism and death cult that molests sexual abuse survivors? Like I need her approval? Like naming a bunch of damaging parasites is worse than their preying on the vulnerable? If she was ‘qualified’ she would recognize the harm, and if she wasn’t such an entitled arsehole, she’d report the abusers. Anyway, she can stay on the list for another few years, and too bad if she misses out on clients. They don’t deserve her. I have, however, removed others from the list who were able to show they no longer advertised Esoteric services, and asked politely.’
Now for a woman that equates meditation and listening to a few lectures as equivalent to holding a gun to someone’s head, surely this refusal to remove someone’s name is a threat? But perhaps not, Esther Rockett’s perspective appears to have become somewhat limited.
Esther Rockett’s hysterical protestations of victimhood and innocence appear to conveniently ignore the machinations of her fellow blogger Robert Macindoe – who has made numerous lewd and offensive posts on her blogs and has extended his campaign to making threats through direct emails. The tone of Mr Macindoe’s comments and emails are often menacing or lewd and the email address he uses starting with ‘eroticdoberman’, contains an obvious and offensive sexual overtone. Added to this are suggestions of direct violence, for example, these online posts directed to Serge Benhayon and his family:
‘If someone was to break into your home , rape your wife and kids and make a mess of you with a baseball bat , you would view this act as less of a karmic infringement than if that person made a modest donation to breast cancer research ? This maybe something Serge you should “Ponder on”.’
‘Karma is heading your way Serge and it will be swinging its big club. Over and Out -Eric ’
This veiled threat made by Robert Macindoe via email to Dr Eunice Minford also has an overtone of sexual violence:
‘the error of OUR DAY ………….” you cant be that much of an idiot Mindflop-PLato was referring to his day – circa 430-320 BC ,and by the way plato knew buggar all about medicine -a bit like that fuckwit benhayon. oh sorry i forgot he’s pythagoras isn’t he and im clarke gable and you are …..? frustrated -and i’ll be in ireland in august , could be your lucky month’
But there are other threats, like this one made by Robert Macindoe on Esther Rockett’s blogs:
‘To [redacted] –
Suggested note to self :
Don’t fuck with DV !!
– Dobbsie ( another Detractor )’
Or another online comment made on the Rick Ross Forum by Robert Macindoe (under the alias Eric Dobbs):
If you think you’ve won the media battle, think again. That was just entree buddy boy.
Lance Martin (under the name COncerned Partner) has also engaged in extensive online comments that contain obvious veiled ‘threats’:
‘Just let it be known that the sting may have gone, but the resolve hasn’t. Bringing you down is a commitment and it will happen.’
This may not be a threat of violence, however, it is a threat, and this draws me to my next suggestion – what is the nature of threatening conduct? Is it not sufficient that it is a threat of harm per se? So that a threat to not remove someone’s name from a blog, simply because you can, or to write whatever you want about someone because you can (under the guise of anonymity), even to the extent to falsely accuse them of paedophilia, sexual grooming, being a sexual predator or a ‘dangerous cult’ leader, is that not threatening behaviour? To suggest in action and word that you can write whatever you want about someone whether true or false, without restraint, is that not threatening? Esther Rockett had wielded the power of anonymity, she has allowed others to take up arms against their imagined enemy under that cloak and say whatever they want. Is that not a threat? Further, is that not a harmful threat?
Rather than get distracted by Esther Rockett’s obfuscation, perhaps we should consider that harming conduct is not limited to physical threats and violence – indeed to limit the idea of harm to physical threat and violence defines harm far too narrowly. Esther Rockett is really trying to excuse her own and other’s conduct by suggesting ‘we are really ok because we haven’t been physically aggressive’ we have only been expressing ‘anger and frustration’. So is it just a small matter of the expression of ‘anger and frustration’ to falsely state that someone is a paedophile and a sexual predator again and again with absolutely no evidence to back this up? Is it just a little bit of ‘anger and frustration’ to make similar extensive baseless complaints to employers and public authorities? Or is it more properly understood as threatening and harmful behaviour?
Robert Macindoe has been particularly virulent making numerous offensive and false references to Serge Benhayon’s relationship with his wife Miranda, that we print here for the purpose of our readers witnessing the absolute filth and lies that Robert Macindoe and Esther Rockett have indulged in:
‘Serge – a 30 year old male courted Miranda -a 14 year old school girl while still married to Deborah (mother of Serge’s children )
Now tell us all , Serge , is that a ” true truth ” or just a … truth ? – we would love an answer – Dobbsie’
In emails he has had less restraint with the language he uses. For example –
‘As if Serge invented the act of being in the ‘present ‘. The idea has been around long before that fuckwit Benhayon was even porking his 14 year old tennis star Miranda’
‘Serge was rooting Miranda when she 13 years old – any witless idiot knows that’
None of this is true, not even in a tiny detail. But why would someone post such malicious material? It cannot be read in any way, shape or form other than having harmful intent, and it carries with it a sense of menace, since the person who is sending such material is not intending it to be non-threatening. Much of Robert Macindoe’s lurid material has been published on Esther Rockett’s blogs, for example, the following is just another example of his work:
‘You know DV , it’s no wonder those Brides of Serge are
partnerless – the Ladies ‘fresh out of the shower oiled
birthday suit’ technique obviously doesn’t work but I’m willing to give it a go – God knows I’ve
tried everything else on the wife – Dobbsie’
However, Robert Macindoe has excelled himself in lurid threats and harmful comments when he has submitted comments to blog sites where he knows that his comments will not be published, but he knows someone will have to read them. This conduct goes further than hiding behind a pseudonym on line, and suggests that he must get some perverse pleasure from knowing someone will read his filth or perhaps has a need to have his most vitriolic thoughts exposed and read by someone. The sheer number of the comments suggests that Robert Macindoe was not just a passing commentator but spent considerable time and effort on his unsavoury pastime – this is a very very small sample of his comments:
‘Hi [redacted] firstly let me tell you I’m not a religious person but I am pretty sure Jesus , Buddha and Mohammed wouldn’t have had sex with a minor aged 13 , unlike Sergio Benhayon who fucked his tennis pupil Miranda when she was hardly a teenager .
Now if you continue to support SB and all the UM bullshit ,that’s your problem.
At least take the time to ‘ponder ‘ on this man’s sordid and dark history – one day he will pay the price and frankly I wouldn’t want to be associated with this cheesy little criminal when it all turns to shite ( and it will ) – you betcha’
‘That’s crazy alright ,who’d trust a dodgy little Paedophile ? Only someone stupid like you I guess’
‘Come on girls , serge was rooting Miranda when she 13 years old – any witless idiot knows hat !! Ask her sister anyway if you want to know .
That’s right [redacted] , whether Serge is on or off stage he is still a Paedophile – oh yeah ,and a tax dodger , and a total charlatan …….. Etc etc etc ad nauseum’
‘[Redacted] you are acting like a complete dickhead, Word of advice brother, try growing a testicle and growing up (that means telling serge what you really feel about him ) ,until then don’t put this sort of horseshit out -it doesn’t do you any favours, believe me !!’
‘Yeah I guess the 14 year old Miranda felt safe when good old ‘Uncle Serge’ drilled her on the couch – awesome!’
By considering the material he has published or sent to others you get a sense of what he is capable of. Especially if the menacing or lewd tone of Robert Macindoe’s emails and posts are considered with the email address he uses ‘eroticdoberman’. It is hard to get past the sense that all that is presented here is both harmful and threatening. Not the least because the reader is left unsure as to what the perpetrator will do next. Indeed this was a form of intimidation used by Lance Martin, Esther Rockett and Robert Macindoe – targets were always left unsure of who or what would be the next target, and this was part of their psychological warfare.
Their stated aim at various times was to bring down Universal Medicine and put Serge in gaol – and the relentless pursuit of that goal – appears to me to be a pretty clear threat. So when Esther Rockett cries, but we were just a little angry and frustrated, we didn’t ‘threaten’ anyone, my response is look at the evidence and see if this is just another self-serving lie that Esther delivers to herself?
As Esther Rockett Health Care Activist attempts to hide her tracks as Esther Rockett Cyber-bully and Internet Troll she has a large and toxic digital footprint to hide. Her enabling of others to engage in similar threats and cyber-bullying on her sites, such as Lance Martin Hotels2Go, Robert Macindoe Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, is also part of that toxic footprint.